We sell the document
as much as the vial.
A compound is a substance held at a concentration. That number is either true or it is not, and the only way to know is to read a test somebody else ran. This catalogue is built around making that test easy to find.
How testing worksWhat we hold to
Four principles that decide what gets listed and how it gets presented.
Evidence outranks atmosphere
The specification is the product’s real argument. We put it under the price rather than behind a tab, because a buyer who cannot check the concentration is being asked to trust a photograph.
Two doors, one catalogue
Some people arrive knowing the molecule and the ester. Others arrive knowing what they are training toward. Neither should have to browse the other’s route to find the same shelf.
Legibility is the trust signal
In a category built on skepticism, information that is easy to read and easy to verify does more for conviction than any amount of persuasion styling.
Nothing claims what it cannot show
Every figure on this site traces to a document or is verified through testing. A number without a source is not published.
How it got here
A short history of the catalogue, in the order it happened.
- 2019
First catalogue
Twelve compounds, one manufacturer, and a spreadsheet of batch numbers.
- 2021
Independent assay
Testing moved outside the house. We stopped running the test that cleared our own product.
- 2023
Certificates published
Every batch record became readable on the product page rather than available on request.
- 2025
Eleven categories
The catalogue reached its current shape, with one pigment per category across the whole site.
Editorial policy
Who writes the journal, how it is sourced, and what it will not tell you.
We sell what we write about. That is a conflict of interest, and the honest thing is to say so at the top rather than bury it. Read the journal knowing it, and check the sources.
The byline is the shop, not a person. Articles are written and checked by the people who run this site. No article carries an invented author, and none claims a medical, scientific or legal qualification that nobody here holds.
Every factual claim is sourced. The sources are listed at the foot of each article and cited in the text where they are used. We prefer the primary document — the legislation, the regulator, the standard, the published study — over anybody's summary of it, including ours. Where the evidence is thin or disputed, the article says so instead of picking a side.
No dosing, no protocols, no medical advice. The journal covers testing, verification, the law, and the health risks as health authorities and published studies describe them. It does not tell anybody what to take, how much, or in what combination. Those are questions for a doctor who knows your history, and the answer cannot come from a shop.
Corrections. Articles carry the date they were published and the date they were last revised. If something here is wrong, tell us and we will correct it and say that we did.
Every article in the journal is written by the editorial team and sourced against primary documents. The sources cited are real and the claims are checked against them.